Middle Eastern states are major investors in agricultural land in developing countries, and the nature of this type of investment has raised ethical concerns. These investments pose particular threats to local communities, especially with regards to food and water security. What kind of responsibilities then do investors have given the potential impact of their investments abroad?
Aid flows from Arab countries to the developing world are minimal, although for several decades there has been a major exception to this: Kuwait. Like all government based development agencies, the Kuwait Fund both expands economic, political opportunities and influence for Kuwait through its development efforts while simultaneously improving welfare and capacity building of developing countries. The Kuwait Fund represents a model which other Gulf States can draw on. Its record as a pioneer in the Arab world should be acknowledged.
Energy shortages, much like any widespread natural disaster, affect everyone within a given geographic range. Unlike any controversial government mandate, or newly passed legislation, Pakistan’s power cuts do not discriminate. When the population at large is deprived of something widely considered to be a publicly provided good, a common, anti-government animosity can easily fester, transcending social, political or ethnic boundaries.
Somali piracy has opened the doors to great power competition off the Horn of Africa. Military clashes between the navies present in the waters in and around the Gulf of Aden are almost unthinkable. In fact, coordination among them has been remarkably smooth. Operating independently, they are obtaining valuable war-like experience far away from their waters. Maritime power is one of the essential elements for any country harboring great power ambitions. The Gulf of Aden is the first scenario where a new geopolitical game is being played out.
Facebook's decision to censor its 'Draw Mohammed' page for users within Pakistan has drawn the ire of many Westerners, who view the move as a clear setback to free speech advocacy efforts. A closer, more contextualized examination of the entire issue, however, would reveal that the controversy has absolutely nothing to do with free speech, and absolutely everything to do with hate speech.