More sanctions to come as “psychological war” around Iran steps up

By Andrés Cala

It was US President Barack Obama who said when he picked up his Nobel Peace Prize that “instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace.” Perhaps he was foreshadowing February, when the bulk of war posturing over Iran’s defiant nuclear program would inevitably come.

Saber rattling and the diplomatic tit for tat in the past few days are intrinsically related to Washington’s efforts to impose more sanctions on Tehran by March. But does this mean the region is gearing up for a fight, as many pundits argue?

Quite the opposite, actually. Iranians and Americans, and a myriad of other military powers including Gulf countries, China, Europe, and Russia, are playing for time. The main goal—shared by all with the exception of Israel—is to give diplomacy more time to work, even if that means sanctions.

Consider the recent poker game: the US publically boasts its defensive naval build-up surrounding Iran with deployments of a US missile interceptor fleet and of upgraded and more precise Patriot missiles batteries stationed in Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar.

Iran sees the bet and launches animals into orbit, that is, a non-military use of technology that can be adapted to intercontinental missiles. Washington calls the bluff and says the act is a provocation that should trigger more muscular sanctions.

Both sides meanwhile test-fire missiles and missile interceptor technology, ahead of a Munich security meeting over the weekend where world diplomats debated sanctions.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad switches rhetoric and suddenly says Iran is close to a deal over its nuclear enrichment program, and Western powers again call the bluff and say there is no such thing in the horizon.

Ahmadinejad doubles up by ordering nuclear scientists to enrich uranium up to 20 percent (at least 80 percent is required for nuclear weapons) and opening 10 more enrichment plants around the country, accompanied by a beefed up air defense system. The response from the West is obvious: sanctions must come now.

But all this is precisely to avert war. To begin with, the defensive build-up in the Gulf is not new, as Iran said so itself. The headlines were fed to an American and Israeli public. The message is that Iran’s offensive missile capabilities have been contained and that there is still time for diplomacy.

Iran is also playing for time. It has significantly improved its defensive capabilities in the past few years, at the expense of its offensive ones. By now most agree its nuclear program would survive any Israeli and US strike, baring a nuclear one.

The reason is that its best deterrent is its nuclear program. Tehran wants to show the world—especially Israel—it could build a nuclear bomb, without actually doing so. Already militarily surrounded, that ability is a better safeguard than any other weapon.

Surely sanctions will come, although unilateral and ineffective without China onboard. Iran will continue to fight it out diplomatically. But the end game is to disengage Israel. Too much is at stake for all to risk a regional war.

And this is just one deal of the cards. Expect more. The outcome is in the entire game that will be played out throughout this year.

Comments
Post your comment

required

required (email will never be displayed)

Please enter the following characters in the box provided (case sensitive). This helps us prevent automated programs from creating accounts and sending spam.

All comments are subject to approval

Terms and conditions

Who will have the last dance?

Despite having spent the latter parts of the ‘90s courting Europe, since 2009 Turkish attention, both politically and economically, has started to look East rather than West.  Is this a sign that Turkey, grown tired of its role as the perpetual suitor of Europe, finds the position of regional leader more congenial?

Download PDF

Friend or Foe?

Too many disruptive and unpromising events have been going on just before elections in Iraq, and the promise of a truly democratic state where the rule of law prevails seems grim. These elections will determine much of Iraq’s near future, not only the internal balance of power but also Iraq’s diplomatic relations with other Arab countries, with the US, and with Iran.

Download PDF

Newsletter

Yes, I would like to receive daily news updates from Al Majalla in my mailbox.

Comments

7 Years of AKP Rule

This article reads pretty much as an attack by a pro-Israeli writer who is not happy hearing awkward ...

Enlightened at Mar 7, 2010 1:33 PM

1 comments

Abu Bakr Sedek Abdel Ghaffar: Pakistan is Not on the Road to Civil War

The response level to national disaster is awesome but it's a real shame that so many people take ad ...

exalfungula at Mar 7, 2010 1:32 PM

1 comments

An Inside Job

how i wish i had a copy of this book

olaleye ololade at Mar 7, 2010 1:29 PM

1 comments

A Slippery-Slope

Its a great article and it gives a warning to future investors to the region to take a more cautiou ...

SANJAY CHADHA at Mar 7, 2010 1:28 PM

2 comments

Israeli spying network exposed in Lebanon

Settling scores in a third country sets a dangerous precedence and can cause major aberrations to a ...

Nishthar Idroos at Mar 1, 2010 2:46 PM

1 comments

A Slippery-Slope

Very interesting and informative. Well written. We are proud of you 'beta'.

Sajiv

Sajiv Sibal at Feb 27, 2010 8:18 PM

2 comments

Getting To Grips With The Quetta Shura

The so-called Quetta shura is led by deposed Taliban leader and Osama bin Laden ally, Mullah Omar, w ...

alex at Feb 24, 2010 10:06 PM

1 comments

Born for Kurdistan

Thank you for the Majalla that provides us with insights and details about influential figures like ...

Salim Mahrous at Feb 24, 2010 10:04 PM

1 comments

A Tale of Survival and Broken Promises

I disagree to some extent with the writer. Dubai crisis has had economic and political implications ...

Safiy Helal at Feb 24, 2010 9:59 PM

1 comments